Meropenem monotherapy versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole combination treatment for serious intra-abdominal infections

Infection. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):473-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01713053.

Abstract

In an open, randomised, multicentre trial, the efficacy and tolerability of empirical meropenem monotherapy (1 g intravenously every 8 hours) and cefotaxime (2 g every 8 hours) plus metronidazole (0.5 g intravenously every 8 hours) for 5 to 10 days was compared in 94 patients with serious intra-abdominal infection who required surgery. Eighty-three patients had an evaluable clinical response. Significantly more patients in the meropenem group had a satisfactory clinical response at the end of treatment (41/43 [95.3%] vs 30/40 [75.0%]; p = 0.008). The bacteriological response was also higher in the meropenem group (31/33 vs 26/32). In the bacteriologically evaluable population, a satisfactory clinical response was observed in 31/33 of those who received meropenem compared to 24/32 of the cefotaxime/metronidazole recipients (p = 0.03). Empirical meropenem monotherapy should prove a useful alternative to the currently standard combination treatment for serious intraabdominal infections.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antitrichomonal Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Cefotaxime / therapeutic use*
  • Cephalosporins / therapeutic use*
  • Drug Therapy, Combination / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infections / drug therapy*
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Male
  • Meropenem
  • Metronidazole / therapeutic use*
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Peritonitis / drug therapy*
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Thienamycins / therapeutic use*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antitrichomonal Agents
  • Cephalosporins
  • Thienamycins
  • Metronidazole
  • Meropenem
  • Cefotaxime