Malaria treatment and prevention in pregnancy: indications for use and adverse events associated with use of chloroquine or mefloquine

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996;55(1 Suppl):50-6. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1996.55.50.

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, women frequently report a variety of symptoms during pregnancy, some of which indicate possible illness. Given the adverse impact of malaria in pregnancy, these events may be important for at least two reasons: it may be possible to use reported fever illness as a determinant of which women need an antimalarial intervention, and, it is possible that adverse symptoms following the antimalarial intervention may be important determinants of continued adherence to the prevention regimen. In a cohort of pregnant women enrolled at first antenatal clinic visit in rural Malawi, we evaluated reported fever, determined parasitemia, and placed the women on antimalarial regimens containing chloroquine (CQ) or mefloquine (MQ). We then systematically evaluated reported symptoms following antimalarial drug use after initial therapeutic doses and subsequent prophylactic doses, and monitored women throughout their pregnancy and at delivery. Among 4,187 enrolled women, 1,048 (25%) reported at least one febrile episode during pregnancy before their first antenatal clinic visit. Factors associated with this reported fever included low parity, enrollment in the rainy season, human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity, use of antimalarial prophylaxis before enrollment, high socioeconomic status, normal (compared to low) maternal height and weight, and literacy. Fever before the first antenatal clinic visit was reported by 24.4% of parasitemic women and 25.4% of aparasitemic women; the sensitivity and specificity of fever to identify parasitemic women was 24% and 71%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of first or second pregnancy to identify parasitemic women was 71% and 57%, respectively. Among women on a CQ or MQ regimen, approximately 60% reported side effects (e.g., itching, dizziness, and gastrointestinal disturbances) after a treatment dose and approximately 25% reported side effects after a prophylactic dose; rates and types of symptoms reported were similar in the CQ and MQ groups. Few serious side effects were observed and rates of fetal loss were low and similar in the groups. Reliance on fever illness will be wholly inadequate to identify parasitemic women; therefore, our findings support existing World Health Organization recommendations that presumptive treatment and prevention regimens should be offered to all pregnant women. When resources are inadequate to offer antimalarial prophylaxis to all pregnant women, women in their first or second pregnancy may be a more appropriate target group than pregnant women with reported fever. Education regarding expected minor side effects may reduce rates of poor compliance and improve the effectiveness of the prevention effort.

PIP: 4187 pregnant women with parasitemia attending 4 prenatal care clinics in rural Mangochi District, Malawi, were assigned to 1 of 4 regimens of antimalarial treatment and/or prophylaxis and followed through delivery. The aim was to examine maternal fever and to evaluate side effects and the frequency of adverse reproductive outcomes for their possible association with malaria or the antimalarial drug regimens. The regimens were 3 regimens for chloroquine (CQ), 1 of which was the current standard of care in Malawi, and a mefloquine (MQ) regimen. 25% of the pregnant women claimed to have had at least 1 febrile episode before their first prenatal care visit. Blood smear tests revealed the parasitemia prevalence rate at enrollment to be 44.4%. The sensitivity of fever to identify parasitemic pregnant women was 24%. Fever's specificity was 71%. Only high density parasitemia (10,000 parasites/sq m) was associated with fever (44.9% vs. 25.4% for no parasitemia; odds ratio [OR] = 2.54; p 0.000001). Other significant factors associated with high fever were low parity, enrollment in the rainy season, HIV seropositivity, use of antimalarial prophylaxis before enrollment, high socioeconomic status, normal maternal height and weight, and literacy. The sensitivity of first or second pregnancy to identify parasitemic women was 71%. Its specificity was 57%. About 60% of women from both CQ and MQ treatment groups had side effects after a treatment dose. About 25% had side effects after a prophylactic dose. The leading side effects were itching, dizziness, and gastrointestinal disturbances. There were few serious side effects. Among all women, the spontaneous abortion rate was 1.2% and the stillbirth rate was 3.9%. Women in the CQ and MQ treatment groups had similar abortion and stillbirth rates. Based on these findings, the researchers concluded that using fever as a means to identify parasitemic women is unreliable. They recommend antimalarial treatment and/or prophylaxis for all pregnant women, but when resources are limited it should be administered to women in their first or second pregnancy.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Antimalarials / adverse effects
  • Antimalarials / therapeutic use*
  • Chloroquine / adverse effects
  • Chloroquine / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Fetal Death / epidemiology
  • Fever / epidemiology*
  • Humans
  • Malaria, Falciparum / complications
  • Malaria, Falciparum / drug therapy*
  • Malaria, Falciparum / prevention & control
  • Malawi / epidemiology
  • Mefloquine / adverse effects
  • Mefloquine / therapeutic use*
  • Parasitemia / epidemiology
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic / drug therapy*
  • Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic / prevention & control
  • Pregnancy Outcome*
  • Rural Population

Substances

  • Antimalarials
  • Chloroquine
  • Mefloquine