Early termination of a prospective, randomized trial comparing teicoplanin and flucloxacillin for treating severe staphylococcal infections

J Infect Dis. 1987 Feb;155(2):187-91. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.2.187.

Abstract

In a prospective, randomized trial, teicoplanin (at a 400-mg intravenous loading dose followed by 200 mg/day intravenously or intramuscularly) was compared with flucloxacillin (8 g/day) in patients with severe staphylococcal infections. Teicoplanin proved unsatisfactory for the following reasons: failures or relapses were more frequent in the teicoplanin group, and blood levels were difficult to predict and tended to be low 24 hr after the loading dose. Future trials with this agent should use much-higher doses.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Cloxacillin / analogs & derivatives*
  • Floxacillin / administration & dosage
  • Floxacillin / therapeutic use*
  • Glycopeptides / administration & dosage
  • Glycopeptides / blood
  • Glycopeptides / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Random Allocation
  • Staphylococcal Infections / drug therapy*
  • Staphylococcus / drug effects
  • Staphylococcus aureus / drug effects
  • Teicoplanin

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Glycopeptides
  • Floxacillin
  • Teicoplanin
  • Cloxacillin