Itraconazole versus ketaconazole in the treatment of oral and oesophageal candidosis in patients infected with HIV

AIDS. 1991 Nov;5(11):1367-71. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199111000-00014.

Abstract

To determine the efficacy and toxicity of two systemically active antifungal agents in the treatment of buccal and oesophageal candidiasis 111 HIV-infected patients with microscopically-confirmed candidiasis were randomized to receive either 200 mg itraconazole once a day or 200 mg ketoconazole twice a day for 28 days in a double blind study. After 1 week of treatment, 75 and 82% of the patients on itraconazole and ketoconazole, respectively, had responded clinically. After 4 weeks of treatment, this had risen to 93% in each group. One patient discontinued itraconozole because of toxicity (rash), five patients discontinued ketaconazole (two nausea, two hepatotoxicity and one rash). Despite successful clinical and mycological clearance, 80% patients had a further episode of candidosis within the next 3 months.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antifungal Agents / adverse effects
  • Antifungal Agents / therapeutic use
  • Candidiasis / complications*
  • Candidiasis / drug therapy*
  • Candidiasis, Oral / complications
  • Candidiasis, Oral / drug therapy
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Esophageal Diseases / complications
  • Esophageal Diseases / drug therapy
  • Female
  • HIV Infections / complications*
  • Humans
  • Itraconazole
  • Ketoconazole / adverse effects
  • Ketoconazole / analogs & derivatives*
  • Ketoconazole / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Opportunistic Infections / complications*
  • Opportunistic Infections / drug therapy*
  • Recurrence

Substances

  • Antifungal Agents
  • Itraconazole
  • Ketoconazole