Ciprofloxacin plus piperacillin compared with tobramycin plus piperacillin as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. A randomized, double-blind trial

Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jul 16;137(2):77-87. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00005.

Abstract

Background: Therapy with an aminoglycoside and a beta-lactam remains common empirical therapy for febrile neutropenic patients. Concerns of aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity have led to studies of alternate regimens.

Objective: To determine whether ciprofloxacin-piperacillin is equivalent to tobramycin-piperacillin as empirical therapy for neutropenic fever.

Design: Randomized, double-blind multicenter trial.

Setting: Seven U.S. university-affiliated hospitals and one private research center.

Patients: Febrile (temperature >/= 38 degrees C), neutropenic (neutrophil level < 1 x 10(9) cells/L) hospitalized patients who had leukemia, lymphoma, or solid tumors, or were undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

Interventions: Patients received piperacillin, 50 mg/kg of body weight intravenously every 4 hours, and ciprofloxacin, 400 mg intravenously every 8 hours, or tobramycin, 2 mg/kg intravenously every 8 hours.

Measurements: Success was defined as resolution of infection and previously positive cultures without the need to give additional antimicrobial agents.

Results: 543 febrile episodes were evaluated, of which 471 were clinically evaluable (234 in the ciprofloxacin-piperacillin group and 237 in the tobramycin-piperacillin group). Success rates in the ciprofloxacin-piperacillin group (63 of 234 febrile episodes) and tobramycin-piperacillin group (52 of 237 episodes) were similar (27% vs. 22%, respectively; difference, 5.0 percentage points [95% CI, -2.3 to 12.8 percentage points]), as was survival (96.2% of patients receiving ciprofloxacin-piperacillin versus 94.1% of patients receiving tobramycin-piperacillin; difference, 2.1 percentage points [CI, -2.2 to 6.4 percentage points]). Additions to the initial antimicrobial regimen were the most common reason for treatment failure in both groups (accounting for 67% of failures in the ciprofloxacin-piperacillin group and 72% in the tobramycin-piperacillin group; difference, 5.0 percentage points [CI, -13.8 to 3.7 percentage points]). Fevers resolved faster in patients receiving ciprofloxacin-piperacillin than in patients receiving tobramycin-piperacillin (mean, 5 vs. 6 days) (P = 0.005). No significant differences in adverse events or toxicity were noted (P = 0.083).

Conclusion: Ciprofloxacin-piperacillin is as safe and effective as tobramycin-piperacillin for empirical therapy of neutropenic fever.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / adverse effects
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Anti-Infective Agents / adverse effects
  • Anti-Infective Agents / therapeutic use
  • Bone Marrow Transplantation / adverse effects
  • Ciprofloxacin / adverse effects
  • Ciprofloxacin / therapeutic use*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Therapy, Combination / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Fever / drug therapy*
  • Fever / etiology
  • Humans
  • Leukemia / complications
  • Lymphoma / complications
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neutropenia / complications
  • Neutropenia / drug therapy*
  • Neutropenia / etiology
  • Opportunistic Infections / drug therapy
  • Opportunistic Infections / etiology
  • Penicillins / adverse effects
  • Penicillins / therapeutic use
  • Piperacillin / adverse effects
  • Piperacillin / therapeutic use*
  • Tobramycin / adverse effects
  • Tobramycin / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Anti-Infective Agents
  • Penicillins
  • Ciprofloxacin
  • Tobramycin
  • Piperacillin